|
|
|
|
 |
|
Electrokinetic Mixing in Microfluidic
Systems Chih-Chang Chang and Ruey-Jen Yang*
|
|
|  | |
|
The applications of
electrokinetics in the development of microfluidic devices
have been widely attractive in the past decade. Electrokinetic
devices generally require no external mechanical moving parts and
can be made portable by replacing the power supply by small battery.
Therefore, electrokinetic-based microfluidic systems can serve as a
viable tool in creating a lab-on-a-chip (LOC) or micro-total
analysis system (μTAS) for use in biological and chemical assays.
Mixing of analytes and reagents is a critical step in realizing
lab-on-a-chip. This step is difficult due to the flow in microscale
devices which are typically limited to low Reynolds numbers,
turbulence does not readily occur. The mixing of two or more fluid
streams in a simple microchannel is dominated by the molecular
diffusion effect. The diffusive mixing time is given by tm ~
w2/D and the mixing length (lm) along the
downstream channel increases linearly with the Péclet number (i.e.
lm ~
Pe×w), where w and D are the channel width and
molecular diffusivity. However, the rate of diffusive mixing in
microscale channels is very slow compared to the convection of the
fluid along the channel since the Péclet number of typical
microchannel flows is very high due to biomolecules (e.g. DNA and
protein) with relatively low molecular diffusivities. To reduce the
mixing time and length, various schemes to enhance micro-mixing have
been proposed in the past years. This review reports recent
developments in the micro-mixing schemes based on DC and AC
electrokinetics. The overview given in this article provides a
potential user or researcher of electrokinetic-based technology to
select the most favorable mixing scheme for applications in the
field of micro-total analysis systems.
Mixing principle
and chaotic mixing Although it is difficult to induce
turbulence (so-called Eulerian chaos) in microchannels, an effective
mixing in low Reynolds number flow regimes can be obtained by the
chaotic advection mechanism (or so-called Lagrangian chaos or
laminar chaos), which provides an effective increase in the
interfacial contact area and concentration gradient due to reduction
of the striation thickness (i.e. diffusion length). In this way,
mixing time and length can be considerably reduced. If an
exponential reduction of striation thickness should occur, the
mixing time and mixing length can be reduced down to tm ~
ln(Pe) and lm ~
ln(Pe), respectively, for chaotic flows in the limit of large
Pe. An effective mixing always requires repeated stretching
and folding of fluid elements, e.g blanking vortex models. Blinking
vortex models are similar to the link twist map (LTM) strategy which
is based on a dynamic system theory described in the literature [1].
An LTM is often obtained when the dynamic system has a structure
such that the motion can be described by the repeated application of
two twist maps. Over the past few years, many effective micromixers
have been designed according to the LTM
strategy.
Micro-mixing based on electrokinetics In
this review, electrokinetic mixing is categorized as either active
or passive mixing, as shown in Fig.1. Passive mixing refers to the
mixing effect in electrokinetically-driven systems and is enhanced
by virtue of their particular geometry topologies, surface
properties, or instability phenomenon which occurs naturally under a
static (DC) electric field. Active mixing refers to the enhancement
of mixing in electrokinetically-driven microfluidic systems using a
time-dependent electric field or in pressure-driven flow systems by
means of an externally time-dependent or -indepentent electrical
force. Chaotic mixing can be achieved by means of the following
schemes: dielectrophoreric (DEP) force perturbation, the shaking of
electrowetting-based droplet, DC/AC EKI (or EHD) instability,
field-induced electroosmosis, and surface charges or grooved surface
patterning.

FIG.2 (a) Heterogeneous surface charge patterning
configuration in a T-shape microchannel. (b) Experimental image of
species mixing in the homogeneous and heterogeneous charged
microchannel. [2]
FIG. 1 Classification scheme for microfluidic mixing
based on electrokinetics.
In general,
electrokinetic passive mixing can be categorized as either
lamination or chaotic mixing. In the case of lamination mixing,
mixing mainly relies on the molecular diffusion effect between two
or more parallel streams, while chaotic mixing usually refers to the
interfacial contact area between two mixing streams. Heterogeneous
surface charge (or zeta potential) patterning is one passive method
to create chaotic electroosmotic flow mixing. Biddiss et al. [2]
used a polybrene-coated method to create a non-uniform zeta
potential distribution on the bottom of a PDMS microchannel, as
shown in Fig.2(a). The zeta potential of native-oxidized PDMS and
polybrene-coated surfaces are -83mV and 32mV, respectively. In this
mixing channel, the channel wall with negative zeta potential drives
the flow along the net flow direction, while the heterogeneous
surface with a positive zeta potential tends to stop the flow. To
satisfy continuity, transverse flow components must be induced in
the heterogeneous regions (i.e. transverse pressure gradients are
induced), resulting in secondary flows within the mixing channel. In
Fig.2(b), it can be seen that the transverse flow was induced and
the mixing was greatly enhanced in the heterogeneous microchannel.
In addition, Chang and Yang [3] also employed a particle tracking
method to visualize the fluid mixing process from a cross-section
perspective in heterogeneous microchannels, as shown in Fig.3. The
mixing channels considered in their study were characterized by a
periodically repeating mixing protocol. Figure 3(a) shows that
clockwise transversely rotational flows with an elliptic region
(i.e. an unmixed island) are generated in the microchannel.
According to Kolmogorov -Arnold-Moser (KAM) theorem in the dynamic
system, the fluid in this region cannot mix with their surroundings
(without a molecular diffusion effect). Thus, the mixing is locally
chaotic in the mixing channel with patterned straight diagonal
heterogeneous strips. In contrast, the unmixed island vanishes in
Fig. 3 (b) and the global chaotic mixing is induced. It is seen that
two unequal counter-rotating vortex flows (i.e. a blinking vortex)
exist in this mixing system. The blinking vortex provides the main
transport mechanism of the two different colored particles from left
to right and right to left in a periodic manner. The concept of this
design fits within the LTM framework [1].

FIG.4 (a) Schematic of AC electroosmosis induced a
secondary flow in a microchannel with a pair of coplanar electrodes.
(b) Fluorescence images of mixing between two streams with or
without an applied sinusoidal voltage. [5]
FIG.3 Visualization of mixing at different periods in
microchannels with (a) straight diagonal heterogeneous strips and
(b) staggered asymmetric herringbone heterogeneous strips. The zeta
potential ratio of the heterogeneous strip (ζ2) to channel wall (ζ1) is -0.5. [3]
The choice of driving
amplitudes and frequencies, and optimization of operation conditions
usually is a challenge in designing an active micro-mixer. Under
appropriate operation conditions, the major portion of
electrokinetic active mixing schemes in the literature is able to
induce chaotic mixing. Field-induced electroosmosis has been widely
applied to the active control of electroosmotic flows and liquid
pumping in microchannels [4], with a lesser application in
micro-mixing. Sasaki et al. [5] proposed a rapid micro-mixing scheme
for a pressure-driven flow system combined with AC electroosmosis.
AC electroosmosis can be induced by an AC field without
electrochemical reactions on electrodes like electrolysis and bubble
generation, so long as the frequency is higher than the inverse
electrode reaction time (>1 kHz). The double layer polarization
is induced by a capacitive charging mechanism. The time-averaged
slip velocity on the electrode surface is proportional to the square
of the applied voltage on electrode [4]. Therefore, a higher
electroosmotic flow velocity can be produced with a lower applied
voltage at an optimal frequency. Figure 4 (a) shows a schematic of
an AC electroosmosis induced flow pattern in a microchannel with a
semi-elliptic cross section. By designing a twisted electrode
patterning configuration as shown in Fig.4 (b), a blinking vortex
flow can be produced in the downstream channel which results in a
chaotic mixing. This mixer also fits within the LTM framework [2].
There remain opportunities for new developments in electrokinetic
micromixers based on field-induced electroosmosis.
Future
directions In general, the performance of chaotic advection
mixers is not largely dependent on the Péclet number. Accordingly,
the development of future micromixers should focus particularly on
passive or active chaotic mixing schemes. In DC
electrokinetically-driven microfluidic systems, high flow rates
usually require high electric field strengths, and even then a high
power supply is required. This is a great disadvantage in trying to
realize a portable microfluidic system. Accordingly, low-voltage, AC
electrokinetic techniques are expected to receive increasing
attention in the coming years. Finally, it is known that the high
flow rates required to achieve species mixing can be produced
through various field-induced electrokinetic phenomena [4].
Therefore, the application of field-induced electrokinetic
techniques to realize active mixers and portable microfluidic
systems is likely to emerge as a major research topic in the
microfluidics community in the near
future.
References
- Ottino JM, Wiggins S (2004b) Designing optimal micromixers.
Science 305: 485-486
- Biddiss E, Erickson D, Li D (2004) Heterogeneous surface
charge enhanced micromixing for electrokinetic flows Anal. Chem.
76: 3208-3213
- Chang C-C, Yang R-J (2006) A particle tracking method for
analyzing chaotic electroosmotic flow mixing in 3-D microchannels
with patterned charged surfaces. J. Micromech. Microeng.
16:1453-1462.
- Squires TM, Quakes SR (2005) Microfluidics: fluid physics at
the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77:977-1026
- Sasaki N, Kitamori T, Kim H-B (2006) AC electroosmotic
micromixer for chemical processing in a microchannel. Lab Chip 6:
550-554
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|